![]() ![]() Xem thêm : Ưu điểm nổi bật của các dòng laptop dùng chip intel thế hệ 11 I figured people don’t browse that way so what’s the value of it. I configured BrowsingBench with a rather long “dwell” time on each page, rather than just jamming through a bunch of pages. The pages are stored and served by the benchmark, which means every single page and every single Flash ad is the same. You select between page types, how long you want the test to dwell on a page, and even set the bandwidth you want simulated. With EMBC’s BrowsingBench, you can test browsers in a controlled environment. ![]() You boot into Ubuntu on a laptop that’s connected via ethernet to a wireless router, and then connect your test laptop to that router’s Wi-Fi. The benchmark runs on Linux from a USB key. Enter EMBC BrowsingBenchĮMBC is a small benchmarking outfit that claims its BrowsingBench test removes the variability in testing browsers. That’s not even mentioning that the route the packets take to reach your screen could differ considerably moment to moment. These and other uncontrollable variables are enough to scare me off of running comparative tests using the live internet. on January 1.Įven trying to browse with the same laptop just minutes apart could yield quite a different experience in terms of Flash ads, embedded videos, and other dynamic elements. ![]() EDT on August 29, is going to be different than what I get on 8 a.m. What I get when I point my browser at at 2:14 a.m. As you know, the internet is a dynamic living organism. I’ve read about people using browsing as a rundown test for laptops but I have concerns about how that’s done. What’s generally wrong with browsing tests I began testing the question of different web browsers’ impact on battery life about two months ago, and what I’ve concluded is that there’s a lot of work to be done here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |